[ Team LiB ] Previous Section Next Section

M10.3 Controller Design

Here we consider a P-only controller, since offset is less important than minimizing manipulated variable movement. The question is:

What value of the proportional gain should be used?

It seems reasonable to select a value for the proportional gain that will just assure that constraints will not be violated for the worst-case expected disturbance. Assume that level alarms are set at 20% and 80% of the volume of the vessel. Let DH represent the magnitude of the maximum allowable deviation of the tank height from setpoint, and let DL represent the maximum magnitude of a step disturbance.

Proportional Gain

Assuming that the flow rate out is proportional to the deviation from setpoint,

Equation M10.4

graphics/m10equ04.gif


where kc is a negative number since the flow rate must increase if the tank height is above the setpoint value. The step change in the load disturbance is DL,

graphics/m10equ04a.gif


and the value at the new steady-state after a step disturbance is [from Equation (M10.1)]

graphics/m10equ04b.gif


which yields

Equation M10.5

graphics/m10equ05.gif


Nonlinear Proportional Gain

Since small deviations from setpoint are not critical, it may be desirable to have a controller gain that varies as a function of the magnitude of the error. A possible formulation is

Equation M10.6

graphics/m10equ06.gif


Again, the value of the kc0 term can be determined from the proportional gain term in Equation (M10.5),

Equation M10.7

graphics/m10equ07.gif


    [ Team LiB ] Previous Section Next Section